Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 29(1): 142-148, 2021 12 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1462374

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This work examined the secondary use of clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) for screening our healthcare worker (HCW) population for potential exposures to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at a free-standing, quaternary care pediatric hospital comparing first-degree, patient-HCW pairs identified by the hospital's COVID-19 contact tracing team (CTT) to those identified using EHR clinical event data (EHR Report). The primary outcome was the number of patient-HCW pairs detected by each process. RESULTS: Among 233 patients with COVID-19, our EHR Report identified 4116 patient-HCW pairs, including 2365 (30.0%) of the 7890 pairs detected by the CTT. The EHR Report also revealed 1751 pairs not identified by the CTT. The highest number of patient-HCW pairs per patient was detected in the inpatient care venue. Nurses comprised the most frequently identified HCW role overall. CONCLUSIONS: Automated methods to screen HCWs for potential exposures to patients with COVID-19 using clinical event data from the EHR (1) are likely to improve epidemiological surveillance by contact tracing programs and (2) represent a viable and readily available strategy that should be considered by other institutions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child , Contact Tracing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 28(3): 487-493, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-915884

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to describe the contributions of clinical informatics (CI) fellows to their institutions' coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a survey to capture key domains of health informatics and perceptions regarding fellows' application of their CI skills. We also conducted detailed interviews with select fellows and described their specific projects in a brief case series. RESULTS: Forty-one of the 99 CI fellows responded to our survey. Seventy-five percent agreed that they were "able to apply clinical informatics training and interest to the COVID-19 response." The most common project types were telemedicine (63%), reporting and analytics (49%), and electronic health record builds and governance (32%). Telehealth projects included training providers on existing telehealth tools, building entirely new virtual clinics for video triage of COVID-19 patients, and pioneering workflows and implementation of brand-new emergency department and inpatient video visit types. Analytics projects included reports and dashboards for institutional leadership, as well as developing digital contact tracing tools. For electronic health record builds, fellows directly contributed to note templates with embedded screening and testing guidance, adding COVID-19 tests to order sets, and validating clinical triage workflows. DISCUSSION: Fellows were engaged in projects that span the breadth of the CI specialty and were able to make system-wide contributions in line with their educational milestones. CONCLUSIONS: CI fellows contributed meaningfully and rapidly to their institutions' response to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Graduate , Medical Informatics Applications , Medical Informatics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Data Visualization , Electronic Health Records , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Leadership , Medical Informatics/education , Public Health Informatics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL